English (United States)
   
Expertise et savoir faire
R&D
Formation permanente et accompagnement
Qualité et sécurité
Publication scientifiques et pro
Storing fresh equine semen
Bovine semen frozen in egg yolk
Five different vitrification devices
Chilled and frozen semen
Post-thaw viability of dog semen
Cushioned centrifugation technique
Post-thaw sperm parameters in ram semen
Fertility of ram semen frozen in Bioxcell
Fecundity of stored porcine semen
Improved viability following a storage period
Boar semen quality
Motility of porcine spermatozoa
Intrauterine insemination of sows
Liens et Partenariats
IMV fonds ecrans

Intrauterine insemination of sows

  • Watson, P.F. and Behan, J.R.
  • Intrauterine insemination of sows with reduced sperm numbers: results of a commercially based field trial.
  • Theriogenology. 57, 1683-1693.
  • 2002
  • Ref ID: WATSON2002

Abstract: Artificial insemination (AI) in pigs requires 2-3 billion spermatozoa to achieve consistently high fertility with current practice of inseminating into the posterior region of the cervix. We have investigated the potential advantages of inseminating through the cervix into the caudal region of the uterus using lower sperm numbers. Total sperm doses from 22 boars of 3, 2 or 1 billion spermatozoa were packaged in 80 ml volumes in X-Cell extender in gene-flat-pack (Cochette) bags. A novel inseminating device, the Deepgoldenpig, was employed which permits the ready introduction of a narrow catheter through the cervix into the uterus without traumatic injury to the mucosa. This was compared with the standard Goldenpig device that allows semen to be deposited in the posterior folds of the cervix. Sows of two different genotypes and of parities ranging from 2 to 11 were used. They were selected solely on the basis of a weaning to estrus interval of 4-6 days. Two inseminations, with a 24 h interval between them, were carried out on each sow. Pregnancy was determined at 35 days by ultrasound scan, and farrowing and litter size recorded. Pregnancy and farrowing data were very similar. The standard inseminating device produced farrowing rates of 91.1, 91.8 and 65.8% for insemination with 3, 2 and 1 billion spermatozoa, whereas the deep insemination device gave rates of 90.5, 90.5 and 86.9%. Only the 1 billion dose with the standard device was significantly different from the high dose control (P < 0.001). Similarly, the mean litter sizes with the standard device were 12.5, 12.6 and 10.3 and with the deep insemination device 12.3, 12.3 and 12.1. Only the 1 billion dose with the standard device was significantly lower (P < 0.001). None of the covariates differed significantly and there were no significant interactions with treatment. We conclude that transcervical insemination in the sow is simple, effective and safe, and allows the sperm dose to be reduced to 1 billion spermatozoa